Broker News

White and Williams LLP Leave AFX Legal | Wibest Broker

AFX Capital Ltd. declined to pay its outstanding invoices for the legal services it received. Consequently, White and Williams LLP filed a motion to withdraw from the broker and its defendant as its legal representative.

WW claims they repeatedly attempted to communicate with the broker for this matter, but the broker refused to respond. The firm filed the motion with the New York Court, claiming that “irreconcilable differences have arisen.”

Previous legal representatives Foley & Lardner LLP also withdrew as counsel in 2018. F&L said this was because the broker didn’t pay “significant legal services” without communicating.

Two more legal counsels are currently requesting to withdraw as the financial service provider’s representatives.

Chapter 11 Trustee of Avenica, Inc. and Gallant Capital Markets, Ltd. Esther DuVal is in a legal battle against AFX. DuVal is seeking Sanctions and Feed for Engaging in Bad Faith and Injunction Relief.

The broker failed to pay a settlement amount of $830,000, which both parties agreed on. The broker had to deposit $230,000 by May, but the company has not paid yet.

DuVal’s accusation claims that the broker used manipulative strategies of delay, obfuscation, and fabrication. White and Williams LLP, at the time, said the Sanctions were entirely “without merit.”

AFX Suspensions

CySEC and the UK Financial Conduct Authority suspended the financial service licenses earlier this year.

FCA closed all open positions on its clients on August 7th and liquidated all positions to cash balances. By the same date, the company’s representatives cannot conduct regulated activities except with written consent from the FCA.

The firm was mandated to hold all client money for clients by the UK regulator’s rules.

CySec previously suspended the broker’s license in July for ten days. However, the Commission has not said AFX can continue its operations yet.

The Commission asked Chapter 11 Trustee Joseph Maniscalco, Esq, to wait for the broker’s status reports regarding the settlement.

Maniscalco filed the sanctions anyway. WW requested for the motion’s withdrawal so both parties can address it in court, but Maniscalco refused.

Share
Published by
John Marley

Recent Posts

  • Cryptocurrencies

Bitcoin Retreats to Mid-$57K Post-Fed Rate Decision

Quick Look: Bitcoin price currently consolidates around $57,000, down by 5%; Fed maintains high interest… Read More

4 days ago
  • Technology

Microsoft’s $1B Investment in OpenAI to Rival Google

Quick Look: Microsoft invested $1 billion in OpenAI in 2019 to catch up with Google… Read More

4 days ago
  • Cryptocurrencies

Ethereum in Ascending Channel: Risk at $3,000, Upside to $3,500

Ethereum in Ascending Channel: Risk at $3,000, Upside to $3,500 Quick Look: Bullish Channel: Ethereum… Read More

5 days ago
  • Technology

PayPal’s Strong Start in 2024: $403.9B Payment Volume Surge

PayPal's Strong Start in 2024: $403.9B Payment Volume Surge Quick Look: Significant Volume Increase: PayPal… Read More

5 days ago
  • Broker News

XTB Steps Into UK ISA Market, Plans Autumn Launch

XTB announced its entry into the UK's £400 billion ISA market less than a quarter… Read More

6 days ago
  • Brokers Reviews

BTN Centre Review

In this BTN Centre review, we will embark on a trading journey, where cutting-edge technology… Read More

6 days ago