Robinhood Wins Against Urges for Restraining Order

A few days ago, the Millennial trading app Robinhood faced accusation of paying clients to back out from a class action. A US District Judge denied an Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order against the firm for “misleading communications.”

Lawyers’ allegations revolved around a $75 goodwill credit to compensate for the firm’s losses from an outage in early March. In exchange, they signed on a DocuSign document 36 hours before filing the motion.

The system problem locked out 10 million users from their accounts during historic swings in the stock market.

Plaintiffs began with a Robinhood user, Travis Taaffe, filing a lawsuit against the company for three claims. Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, and Robinhood Securities, LLC faced accusations of breach of contract and warranty of merchantability.

Alongside the restraining order, the Plaintiff was urging to file against Robinhood from making clients to sign the DocuSign. The document includes a complete waiver of rights that the company didn’t identify or imply for its users.

US District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell found that the Plaintiff failed to establish clear records of abusive communication. As a result, the motion was denied on March 31, 2020, in Tampa, Florida.

The Robinhood Outage

Thousands of Robinhood traders were enraged when Robinhood experienced a system-wide outage on a massive day at the stock market. The Dow Jones Industrial Average had been dealing with its single biggest-point gain since 2009.

A Twitter account called Robinhood Class Action gained 8000 followers after they received the $75 compensation for million-dollar losses. Robinhood’s CEO blamed the shutdown on volatile market conditions and record trading volume, as well as records of new account requests.

Millions of users weren’t able to figure out how they fared on the first week of March. Some clients complained about now having access to their accounts altogether.